Particularly impressive is the accuracy with which glycohemoglobin predicts cardiovascular outcomes such as heart attack and stroke in non-diabetics.

Glycohemoglobin is a well-known predictor of vascular events in people with diabetes – but the fact that it is such a powerful predictor of vascular disease and death in non-diabetics is big news.

Many of my patients have slightly high fasting blood sugars on their physical. It’s hard to know what to tell them. Does a blood sugar of 103 mean they are going to get diabetes? Do they need to be on medicine like metformin to lower their sugar?

It looks like glycohemoglobin (which gives an “average” for the blood sugar over a three month period) will be a much more accurate test. We can avoid frightening patients over meaningless random fluctuations in glucose; and we can better identify those in need of real risk factor modification or medicine to lower their blood sugar, before frank diabetes develops.

AP article here.

Mass Medical Society has released this year’s Physician Workforce Survey.  The number of primary care practices accepting new patients has dropped from 58 to 44 percent.  The practice climate for primary care is getting more difficult every year, with the flood of paperwork coming from the insurance companies, the advent of “tiering“, and primary care reimbursement dropping every year while specialty incomes rise.  Most physicians completing residency programs and looking for careers in general medicine are sensibly choosing hospital medicine, where salaries are higher and the hours better.

I am a Democrat.  I supported Barak Obama in his campaign.  I think he’s a good president.  From a citizen standpoint, I think his healthcare plan, if passed, will probably improve health care quality and access at least modestly.  But from a primary care standpoint, I’m disappointed.  None of the various drafts and proposals I’ve seen do a thing to address the crisis in primary care.

If we keep paying enormous sums for invasive procedures, and next to nothing for doctors to listen, think and communicate with patients, then we’ll continue to have an expensive, fragmented, procedure-based healthcare system rather than a humane and rational one focused on patient needs.

The standard vaccine seems to generate an adequate immune response in healthy adults after a single dose.  It depends on the results of other trials, but maybe we’ll only need one dose of this vaccine.  They were talking about two doses for everyone, which would pose a problem since supplies will be limited.

One dose should also be OK for older kids and pregnant women.  No data yet on younger children and immunosuppressed persons (older and/or with chronic diseases).

No major adverse effects seen but the studies were not large enough to detect rare side effects.

Maybe I will start posting blog entries again – I keep reading interesting journal articles and meaning to share them. Too busy taking care of patients to blog! Yikes. Remind me why I started this practice again?

They are so cool!

Here is a picture of a cedar leaf in cross section, using polarized light.

And here’s a marine worm using a technique called confocal photography (which is explained in detail on the site, for you photomicrography bugs.

This one is the seed of the small-flowered willowherb (Epilobium parviflorum).

And this lovely scene is some rat hippocampal neurons being attacked by Alzheimer’s related neurotoxins>

I don’t know that these images demonstrate the beauty of nature, so much as the beauty of photographic images that depict nature in clear lines and bright, nifty colors.

Still, they’re great to look at.

How he heard about Tregellys Fiber Farm in Hawley, I do not know. What he failed to tell us when we met up at the Creamery in Cummington is that is is a forty-five minute drive into the middle of nowhere.

He and my mom cruised on ahead, no doubt listening to classical music on the radio, chatting and enjoying the scenery.

In our car, Rebecca immediately starts on a migraine. The kids occupy themselves by making as much noise as possible: scatological screeching, punctuated by repeated demands for various things that cannot be procured on a small country road in Ashfield.

On and on we drive. We’ve been going for miles on a single-lane dirt road through a pine and beech forest. It’s been fifteen miles since we passed even a house.

Jane starts to feel carsick. Poor Rebecca is sitting silently with her eyes closed looking tense. I am thinking how much I would rather be almost anywhere than in this car on a beautiful fall day, and about the hydrocarbons we’re emitting, and global warming, and wondering what on earth my father was thinking; and also trying to concentrate on my out-breaths and relax into the moment, which is not working. I am not relaxing.

Then, suddenly, we come into a clearing and we’re in…

Tibet.

This farm is set on a steep, rocky hillside overlooking a forested valley. Just beyond the farmhouse, the ground falls away steeply and you can barely see to the bottom of the ravine, where another mountain rises just as severely, filling up the horizon.

Okay, it’s not the Himalayas, but it’s an incredibly beautiful, secluded corner of western Massachusetts. The hill above the road is figured with large stone terraces. At the edge of the rise stands a tall stupa (Tibetan prayer shrine).

In large wire pens, or roaming about free, are animals such as Bactrian camels, Royal Pinto Yaks and Icelandic sheep and rams. Plus pigs, sheep and chickens, and a pet duck who swims around in a spectacular hand-laid slate fountain the size of a small pond.

The kids, of course, had a great time running up and down the terraces and petting the animals. No, they had not, previously, seen Bactrian camels (native to the steppes of eastern Asia and domesticated around 2500 B.C.E., we learned).

Apparently Ed Cothey and Pamela Steward bought the land thirteen years ago and raised conventional animals there. They got a story in the local paper when they bought a llama. This attracted some visitors from Tibet, nostalgic for home. One thing led to another, and soon they had several Tibetan families living with them.

Then they started to import Asian animals. One of their guests contributed the terracing and the stupa; and stayed to open a Tibetan stonework business based on the farm.

Ed is an accomplished weaver, and Pamela is quite a good poet. She has a book with the University of Chicago Press.

Such a place, in the hills of Western Massachusetts. Who knew?

Plus they told us about Tibet Fest 2007, in Goshen, Connecticut. So we have next weekend planned already.

Here’s one from the American Heart Journal, Progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with bradyarrhythmias.

We know that some patients can have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation for decades, and others progress gradually to persistent atrial fibrillation.

The authors studied recordings from implantable devices for a bit over a year, looking at the “cumulative daily AT/AF burden.” The findings:

Seventy-eight patients (24%) progressed to persistent AT/AF during the follow-up period with a mean interval of 147 ± 149 days. Mean AT/AF burden increased progressively (slope 14 s/d, P < .001) over 500 days after implant, and median AT/AF burden also increased (P < .01) in this subgroup of patients. This increase was highly correlated with the presence of structural heart disease (P < .001).

In the discussion, the authors note that, first of all, implantable devices are useful for following the progression of atrial tachyarrhythmias. In terms of the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation:

We observed that a proportion of patients progressed to persistent AF. In this population, this was 24% at a mean follow-up duration of 5 months. This is a more rapid transition than previously suspected and may be related to the more sensitive recording method. The mean AT/AF burden has remained relatively constant over time in the patients remaining in paroxysmal AF, whereas it steadily increased in those transitioning to persistent AF…

We were able to obtain unique insights into the period around transition from paroxysmal to persistent AF. Interestingly, this transition is rather sudden and discrete in most patients rather than gradual as previously hypothesized. There is no substantial AF burden surge immediately before the transition point, suggesting that the persistent AF event is triggered by a single or very low density triggering arrhythmia and may be maintained by a remodeled substrate.

The clinical implications? In patients with devices, we may be able to predict the likelihood of progression, with yet-to-be-defined algorithms. And, with regard to directions for therapeutic research:

The focus of many AF therapies has been to reduce trigger mechanisms. This new understanding from device data logs strongly promotes interventions directed at the substrate. Atrial-specific antiarrhythmic drugs, multisite atrial stimulation for electrical resynchronization, and linear ablation/isolation for ablative approaches are more likely to favorably affect the substrate. Drugs such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and other therapies such as dual-site atrial pacing may improve hemodynamics, potentially slowing the progress of substrate decay.

Finally, quantifying cumulative time and and out of fibrillation may help us to estimate thrombotic risk more precisely in individual patients and better direct anti-thrombotic therapy.

Yesterday was Rosh Hashanah, the beginning of the Jewish New Year, which ends eight days from now with Yom Kippur. Between the two holidays, we focus our thoughts on repentance, and on returning to God.

An interesting thing about Judaism is that many of its essential themes were forged at a time of defeat and loss. The notion of a Covenant with a protective God certainly predated the sack of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 586 B.C.E. In fact, the idea of a patron God who resided in a temple and protected the kingdom was commonplace in the Bronze Age. I think the Judeans and Israelites endowed this with a bit more of a Utopian character than their neighbors, but the basic theology was not terribly different.

It was not until the destruction of Solomon’s temple Jerusalem and the exile of most Judeans to Babylonia that Judaism took on its distinctive character.

One must imagine people who had faced the individual fear, deprivation and loss of a long siege, had seen their agricultural land laid waste, their cities razed, and their God desecrated. Then they were shipped off to exile in Babylonia.

There, for some reason, rather than adopting the gods and customs of the Babylonians, they reconstructed their religion. Now, however, they had no place to carry out animal sacrifices and other rituals, no physical space for worship – no temple in which their God could live among them. They were forced to think about the non-ritual aspects of their religion.

More importantly, their experience challenged the fundamental concept of an inviolable sanctuary protected by an all-powerful deity who would provide eternal protection to the descendants of Abraham.

The religious thinkers of the Judeans reconciled the dilemma this way: They maintained the belief in an omnipotent God, but they incorporated the new idea of a people who could sin. The people could turn away from God, could incur God’s anger and punishment. By turning back to God, they could also earn God’s forgiveness.

The Prophetic writings, which most directly address the exilic situation, are full of expressions of this relationship between God and Israel. God is presented (in patriarchal fashion) as a jealous husband who punishes an unfaithful wife; as a farmer pruning away diseased vines; as a merchant sorting the good fruit from the bad.

In the process, and almost by accident, the nature of God’s existence is re-conceptualized. He is not just the most powerful among a pantheon of deities associated with various nations. Rather, he has power over all nations: he sends an army from afar to punish his unfaithful people. By the same construct, God can be present for the Judeans in Babylonia even though there is no temple. The temple in Jerusalem is thus proposed to have housed God’s Name – not God Himself, who is omnipresent and cannot reside in a physical structure.

In this way, I think, the notion of sin and redemption was forged. It has been of central importance to Judaism and to the religions derived from it, Christianity and Islam.

I will write a bit more in a future post about the resonance this has for me, especially in relation to biology and the medical arts.